04/30/2025 / By Laura Harris
Moderna could be suspended from the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) of the United Kingdom following multiple violations in the regulatory code of the industry.
The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), set to audit the company over “unacceptable” practices that have “brought discredit upon the industry,” reveals multiple violations of Moderna, including offering children £1,500 ($2,008) and teddy bears as incentives to participate in vaccine trials – a practice banned under U.K. regulations. (Related: Moderna now openly running vaccine experiments on CHILDREN as young as six months old.)
Moderna claimed it acted promptly after being notified by the Health Research Authority in January 2024. However, evidence shows senior executives were informed in August 2023 by the campaign group UsForThem but failed to intervene.
In turn, the PMCPA ruled the company’s lack of transparency “completely unacceptable” and a violation of U.K. clinical trial laws, which prohibit financial incentives for child participants.
A senior Moderna employee also co-authored three articles, including one with former vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi in another breach to promote their COVID-19 vaccines without disclosing his affiliation. The employee also sent promotional tweets from a personal account, failing to declare his role at Moderna. The PMCPA deemed these actions improper advertising, saying the failure to declare conflicts of interest was “unacceptable.”
Moreover, the PMCPA has identified ten additional violations, raising concerns about corporate accountability, especially as they involved three senior executives. If deficiencies are found, the Appeal Board could impose sanctions, including suspension or expulsion from the ABPI.
In response to the potential suspension, Molly Kingsley, founder of UsForThem, said that Moderna has repeatedly prioritized profits over safety, particularly concerning children.
“Many of the previous judgments against Moderna have revealed how readily it put profit ahead of the health and safety of children. Now it has also laid bare just how little regard it has had for the regulatory system that was supposed to keep it honest. Never before has a company so new to the pharmaceutical industry been rebuked in this way,” Kingsley said.
Meanwhile, critics like Esther McVey, a former member of the all-party parliamentary group on COVID-19 vaccine damage, argued that current penalties fail to deter misconduct.
“The news that the PMCPA is taking the highly unusual step of ordering an audit of Moderna’s culture, governance and compliance framework is reputationally damaging, but it is incredible that the regulator has no real power to impose appropriate fines or other meaningful penalties which might make pharmaceutical companies think twice before breaking the rules,” McVey said.
“They know they can get away with it, and so they do; time and time again. It’s hardly surprising that public trust in the pharmaceutical industry and its regulators is through the floor.”
The revelations fuel growing skepticism over pharmaceutical oversight, as campaigners demand stronger enforcement and transparency to restore confidence in vaccine safety.
Follow Immunization.news for more news and information related to vaccines.
Watch the video below to learn more about VAIDS and COVID-19 vaccines.
This video is from the What is happening channel on Brighteon.com.
Canadian mRNA expert SUSPENDED for criticizing COVID vaccine for children.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
children, clinical trial, coronavirus, covid-19, experimentation, experiments, guinea pigs, human rights, medical ethics, Moderna, money, pediatric, teddy bears, United Kingdom, vaccination, Vaccine injuries, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
ChemicalViolence.com is a fact-based public education website published by Chemical Violence Features, LLC.
All content copyright © 2018 by Chemical Violence Features, LLC.
Contact Us with Tips or Corrections
All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.